A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning prospective neighbours around the development of a wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has captivated countrywide attention pursuing an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods report about René Collier along with the Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design is effective at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a firm director respectively, look for to create their family home. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established residents. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting created by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each residents of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their planning authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore spots are topic to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, specifically within a delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, which is partially built, is in the proper posture. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, the place views of The ocean are each really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary efforts because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, Based on sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times, a picture which has considering that develop into emblematic with the depth of your dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were meant to Collect visual evidence of your wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the drinking water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the location grew to become One of the more striking descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even more submissions on whether or not interim orders really should be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important second from the legal timeline.
With the Main on the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as produced, goes past what was accredited and intrudes into secured land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become referred to as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and conditions attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is motivated by issue for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private check out, insisting rather that it's about making certain that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair simply seeking to develop a household household in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Place of Conservation and say that every one will work are actually carried out depending on professional tips and permitted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with coming into The ocean all through a storm, will not alter the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around building of wall at coastal web page has grown to be a shorthand description for a problem that lots of observers see as more and more popular. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Periods post about René Collier famous the businessman experienced Earlier been linked to community advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty unique Experienced backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-substantial h2o through a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded through waist-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical actuality of the coastline plus the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an abnormal approach.
As the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must ascertain if the wall as developed complies with scheduling authorization and no matter if any encroachment into a Specific Region of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing conditions. Nevertheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who need to Stay alongside each other lengthy following the legal charges have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the case lengthen beyond that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the importance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. In addition it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental protection and house rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of organic splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of your dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether or not it'll ultimately be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.